Should Any Americans Be Allowed To Protest Anywhere in America?

     Americans should be allowed to protest anywhere in America and wear signs if they wish to do so even if it is considered disrespectful or inappropriate to the majority of Americans and the U.S. military in my opinion.  The protestors should remain peaceful and at a distance from the event such as a military funeral, private funeral, or any other event that the protestors oppose so that the federal government is not diminishing freedom of speech any more than it has already been diminished.  It is my opinion that when any U.S. citizen is denied their right to peacefully protest anywhere on U.S. soil within a reasonable distance that we are asking the federal government to deny us more of our freedoms and regulate our behaviors.  There is a fine line between disagreeing with protestors and denying freedom of speech.

     For example, gays have protested against Christians and the bible and and wear signs and march up and down the street nearly nude and so forth, but under the Freedom of speech, expression, and so forth, that is allowed in America.  People may not agree or like it, or even find it offensive, but according to the law, they have the right to march on public sidewalks peacefully.  Americans, who oppose the war have a right to protest, even if it is at a funeral, as long as they are not disturbing the funeral proceedings in my opinion. Even  if the majority of people believe that it disrespects the dead, the living, and the sacred ground, it's still a free country, but they should be required to stand at a distance and not disturb the event or funeral.

     The building of a mosque in New York city is approved by Mayor Bloomberg and his committee and supported by President Obama, but the majority of Americans protest and oppose it because they are guaranteed the right to exercise freedom of speech under the U.S. Constitution, if other people don't agree.
Most Americans find it is disrespectful and inappropriate to protest at funerals, especially military funerals and I agree with them, but I believe we must be careful when we are asking the federal government to diminish our freedoms, liberties and rights on U.S. soil, which are being trampled upon every day, and regulated through excessive Executive Orders over the past decade and most recently since 2009.

     Americans, who protest at a military funeral, without causing any problems should have that right, but it doesn't mean that most of us agree with them or find it appropriate and in fact, find it disgusting, but that doesn't mean that we should allow the federal courts to continue to deny, diminish, or regulate our rights, freedoms, and control more of our behaviors.  In fact, President Obama just signed another Executive Order to regulate the behaviors of American citizens, so we're treading on dangerous territory.

     How then does the U.S. Justices and the U.S. Congress justify the Hate Crimes Bill, which the 111th Congress passed with flying colors that tramples on equal rights for all citizens?  According to Senator Reid, the Hate Crimes Bill favors gays and Muslims.  For example, it's okay for gays to walk down the street at gay parades wearing nearly nothing with children present; wearing signs; and speaking out against Christians, mock Jesus and the bible, but it's not okay for Christians to oppose their behaviors because the Christian comments can be viewed as "offensive" by a gay person and anything, including words that are considered "offensive" by a gay person can be considered a "hate crime."  Ironically, Christians don't "hate" gays or Muslims, but are expressing their right to speak out  and share their beliefs on U.S. soil peacefully.  Not so long ago, 2 Christian grandmothers and 9 other Christians who were peacefully wearing signs at a gay rally were arrested because the gays at the rally called the police and said their signs were "offensive" according to the news.  The 2 grandmothers, who were arrested, could have gone to jail for 47 years!  They ended up spending thousands of dollars in legal fees spoken from their own lips on television.

     Furthermore, the news recently reported that Christians were arrested  by U.S. officers for standing on U.S. soil paid by our tax dollars because the Muslim youth at a Muslim event (which the article stated the Muslims consider a "no go zone") were speaking to those who asked about Christianity.  In fact, the article stated that their cameras were confiscated by the police, as well. According to articles which discuss the Hate Crimes bill  (similar to the domestic violence bills), anything that a gay or a Muslim finds offensive can be reason enough to arrest another American citizen and cause them grave pain and suffering because of this law that only protects two groups of people according to Senator Reid.  It would appear that this bill violates equality for all people and will end up putting more Christians and other religious persons as well as heterosexuals in jail in the future.

     Therefore, does the "Hate Crimes Bill" protect gays and Muslims or is it a mechanism to silence the majority of Americans and deny the majority of Americans the right to exercise freedom of speech, expression, print, media, and so forth by placing fear in the minds of the majority of Americans that if they say anything or write anything about gays or Muslims that they can find themselves caught up in a legal battle for years or jailed for years as punishment, but the same doesn't apply equally for all people, any longer?

     Think about the long term effects on the U.S. Constitution which these lawsuits are effecting as well as the diminishing of freedom every time a citizen and their lawyers walk into courtrooms and ask for the federal government to regulate their lives and deny our freedoms inch by inch by inch.
    

    

"Is The American Dream on the Verge of the American nightmare?"

     "Is the American Dream on the Verge of the American Nightmare?" This is the question I would ask in my new book, "Fight Back Legal Abuse," and stated on my talk radio shows, "Issues of the Day" which aired between 1989 and 1993.  Unfortunately, most people didn't believe that America was on the verge of the American nightmare because people had jobs and owned the American dream, meaning a home, car, and the money was flowing.  But, who was paying attention to the truth behind the scenes that was creeping into the schools, courtrooms, churches and government?  Most people were too busy working and earning a lot of money to pay much attention and most people didn't want to believe it or hear it, let alone get involved.

     So, as the American people slept, the unseen wealthy elitists were planning for the new millennium and slowly manipulating the American people and conditioning them into believing that under the Clinton administration that open borders, NAFTA, nationalized health care, and outsourcing jobs, was good for America.  Although, there were patriots on the front lines who were attempting to expose the truth to the American people, our words fell on deaf ears.  In fact, during the 90s, under the Clinton administration, many patriots were considered enemies of the state and were sent to jail or worse.  For example, Nebraska Senator, John DeCamp, author of "The Franklin Cover-Up," said that his life was threatened because he exposed the corruption involving missing children during the 80s and 90s.  Recently, Senator Nancy Schaefer, was found dead in her home after she exposed corruption which she alleged involved Child Protective Services on video and on the record.  The fact that the baby boomers and older Americans grew up at a time when crime wasn't big business and the prosecutors prosecuted the real criminals, not the citizens who spoke out against criminals, it is difficult for Americans to comprehend that this could actually happen in the greatest free nation in the world. 

     But, let me remind Americans that it is when the good people do not take responsibility and demand to know who the elected and appointed people paid with tax dollars actually happen to be - true Americans - on the fence Americans - or people with agendas that trample on the Constitution of the United States, bad things happen to good people and to great nations while the people are asleep.

     Therefore, every American should ask themselves, "Is The American Dream on the Verge of the American Nightmare," and take responsibility and exercise their right to vote or they could find themselves without any right to vote.  For more information about Rose Colombo, author of a new book readers are calling "explosive," google http://www.fightbacklegalabuse.com/

Government Agents Seize Oath Keeper's New Born From Hospital

Do the Obamas Want To Control Your Eating Habits & Behaviors?

     During a campaign speech, First Lady, Michelle Obama commented some thing like the American people will have to change their behaviors, but the American people applauded and didn't give it another thought.  Most recently, she's been commenting on obesity and diet and the fact that she doesn't allow her kids to eat anything that she doesn't consider to be healthy.  Politicians and their families do not make such comments unless they are promoting an agenda, but in a subtle manner.  They speak out in such a way that people think that the goal is about health, when in fact, it is about controlling the masses through monitoring and regulating vitamins, supplements, minerals and organic foods as well as other foods.

     Interestingly, President Obama and his family have been on camera when he appears at restaurants ordering pudding, ice cream and fried shrimp.  And, the news reported that he's a closet chain cigarette smoker to boot!  In his books, Obama states that he experimented with drugs, which also adversely effect one's body and health, so it is interesting that they are extremely concerned about controlling what the American people eat or drink with the intent of setting regulations on what Americans can or can't eat or drink, but they eat or drink whatever they want and  Obama smokes.  And, we know Obama drinks beer, but I am not sure if he or Michelle drinks liquor.  And, we don't know what Michelle Obama and her kids have eaten and drank during their many many vacations around the world, now do we?

     President Obama signed another Executive Order 13544 of June 10, 2010, "Establishing the National Prevention, Health Promotion, and Public Health Council."   Ironically, this bill states in Section (c) "provide recommendations to the President and the Congress concerning the most pressing health issues confronting the United States and changes in Federal policy to achieve national wellness, health promotion, and public health goals, including the reduction of tobacco use, sedentary behavior and poor nutrition."  In other words, he smokes, but no one else can smoke.  He eats whatever he wants, but no American will be allowed to eat or drink whatever they want.  He may or may not exercise, but Americans will be monitored regarding their exercise and poor nutritional habits according to how the committee of  his appointed federal government committee sees fit.  So, who is overseeing what those in the federal government will be eating and drinking, smoking, and consuming in the way of beer and liquor or drugs?  For example, everyone knows that President Clinton enjoyed McDonald's burgers.  Most of the politicians drink and many have been reported to have used drugs and many party, so who's monitoring those at the top?

     Wake up, America! Does Obama want to screen you and monitor every American's health and lifestyle and under his new law, order you to modify your eating and exercise habits or else be punished?  Section  (c) "contains a list of national priorities on health promotion and disease prevention to address lifestyle behavior modification..." in other words, they're going to track you lifestyle behaviors and modify them according to the way the federal government wants you to behave under the guise of "health."  Also, "(including smoking, cessation, proper nutrition, appropriate exercise, mental health, behavioral health, substance-use disorder, and domestic violence screenings) and the prevention measures for the five leading disease killers in the United States."


Rose Colombo, Founder and president of the first self-help group in the nation, "Women Fight Back for Legal Justice, Inc.," (in the process of changing the name) and the author, of a explosive book, "Fight Back Legal Abuse," has helped thousands of victims of legal abuse become surivors of legal abuse as more laws are being created and more people are caught up unexpectedly in the legal system facing an unethical lawyer or bias judge or legal abuses without anywhere to go for help.  She's been seen and heard in the local and national media and newspapers and she's proposed laws that have been implemented as well as spoken before the Justice Department Criminal Planning and the Ca. State Senate and community groups. She created and wrote an Amendment to the California Constitution approved by the Office of the Attorney General, "Judicial Accountability and Limited Immunity Act of 1996."  Her newly released book can be ordered on Amazon.com and BN,com and she invites you to visit her at - http://www.fightbacklegalabuse.com/